YOUR FIRST LOOK INSIDE
Try it. Make up your own mind.
No account, card, or setup. Pick the part you want to explore.
OPTIMIZER / SAVED SAMPLE RUN
See the plan, not just the picks.
Three independent events. A $1,000 bankroll. One unit is $10. This saved example uses Balanced with 0.15 Kelly and allows up to three picks per parlay.
56.5% estimated chance · 1.95 / -105
57.0% estimated chance · 2.00 / +100
54.0% estimated chance · 2.10 / +110
The recommended tickets
Riverside to win
Harbor to win + Riverside to win
Estimated parlay price. Check the actual offer before placing it.
Harbor to win + Westbridge to win + Riverside to win
Estimated parlay price. Check the actual offer before placing it.
Why is Harbor only in parlays, not a single?
A Harbor single has value at these inputs. At 56.5% and -105 · 1.95, a $10 single has $1.01 modeled average profit. But the optimizer compares the whole plan, not each bet on its own.
In the Harbor + Riverside double, and the three-pick parlay. Both need every leg to win.
If only Harbor wins, every ticket above loses. A Harbor single would pay in that situation.
Compare the same plan with parlays switched off
Same probabilities, prices, bankroll, and Balanced settings. Only the parlay switch changed.
Singles + parlays
- Total stake
- 3.40u
- Modeled log growth
- 0.611%
- Harbor single
- 0.00u
Singles only
- Total stake
- 5.11u
- Modeled log growth
- 0.602%
- Harbor single
- 1.46u
The mixed plan reaches slightly higher modeled log growth with less total stake here. But it gives up some winning situations a single would cover. This is not proof of a universal optimum or that parlays are always safer.
Log growth compares how a bankroll could compound across these possible results. It is not a promised return.
You decide what to place. The guided practice lets you compare these same runs and change a tracker copy without rewriting the recommendation.
Try the complete handoff →Inspect every possible result 8 scenarios
These three events are modeled as independent. Parlay odds are multiplied from the single prices. All tickets settle as win or loss. Change those assumptions in a real optimizer and the recommendation may change.
| What happens | Modeled chance | Slate profit / loss |
|---|---|---|
| Harbor wins · North City wins · Vale wins | 11.17% | -$33.97 |
| Metro wins · North City wins · Vale wins | 8.61% | -$33.97 |
| Metro wins · North City wins · Riverside wins | 10.10% | -$29.04 |
| Harbor wins · Westbridge wins · Vale wins | 14.81% | $0.00 |
| Metro wins · Westbridge wins · Vale wins | 11.41% | $0.00 |
| Metro wins · Westbridge wins · Riverside wins | 13.39% | $4.92 |
| Harbor wins · North City wins · Riverside wins | 13.12% | $20.86 |
| Harbor wins · Westbridge wins · Riverside wins | 17.39% | $74.91 |
Modeled expected log growth: 0.611%. This measures average change in the logarithm of bankroll across these scenarios. It is not an actual return. All probabilities here are invented inputs.